If only history had been this much fun when I was at school !
I
didn't really get history when I was at school, either because of the way it
was taught or because I remember most of my history lessons were just after
lunch when watching the other classes play football was far more
appealing. It's a shame really, as had I realised that it could be as
big, bold, fun and thrilling as John Dove's production then I'd have most
certainly taken more notice.
The
play brings to life and light the story behind Anne Boleyn's reputation as
"the Protestant Whore" - how she was very much in love with King
Henry VIII and most certainly didn't (at first) see him as a route to making
England a protestant country. It explores how Henry, fed up with
Catherine's inability to provide him with an heir, was looking for a
"church approved way" to rid himself of her and find another who
could give him a rightful successor.
The
writing, the use of traditional musical instruments and the fabulous costumes
all help to drive the story along at a brisk pace; there is plenty of humour
throughout with the whole ensemble either playing to or falling foul of Howard
Brentons wonderful script.
The
story starts with the newly crowned James I hunting through an old chest
and discovering the hidden secret of Anne Boleyn; the banned bible written and
interpreted by the exiled William Tyndale. Time skips back 70 years,
to when the flirtatious and headstrong Anne first met the young King and how
their lives & loves start to intertwine. Never truly accepted by the
courts, Anne has to battle the prejudices of those who saw her simply as the
King's mistress, a conniver, a harlot and, to some, a witch. It's true
that she cast a spell over Henry, but this was no witchcraft, it was womanly
charm.
Henry,
who believes that as King he can demand favour from anyone he pleases is
suddenly confronted with a woman, who, despite his obvious regal power (and his
complete desire) is prepared to stand firm and refuse any physical union until
they are married. It is over this cliff-edge that the 'Catholic' king
must leap if he is to take Anne as his bride and lover. It is
through this time that Anne realises that she has an ally in her perseverance
of bringing the Protestant faith to the fore - an unlikely and secret ally, but
one who enables her to meet with Mister Tyndale. She takes great strength
through this and announces to the King that she is, in fact, a proud
protestant and that by following the protestant teachings he could become the head
of the Church of England and thus able to dispense his own form of religious
protocols, including divorce.
There
then follows plot & sub plot, alliance and betrayal with regular trips
back to the 'present day' to see how James I was grappling with his own ideas of
how to progress a unified English religion and an official translation of
the Bible. Of course, we know how Anne met her fate, but even the
surroundings leading up to her imprisonment were clouded in treachery not often
fully appreciated.
The
cast all played their parts magnificently - Jo Herbert, as Anne, was
steely strong, defiant and focused yet still naive and vulnerable in the
presence of Henry's courtiers. When not centre stage she floated in
and out of scenes, keeping a constant thread through the whole story.
Julius D'Silva as Thomas Cromwell was subtly threatening, knowingly
menacing and as trustworthy as a basket of vipers. Had this been a
pantomime he would have been the villain but I doubt anyone would have had the
nerve to even whisper a boo.
The
standout performance for me was James Garnon as King James I - King James is a
complex character, thought to have been gay,to suffer from gout and kidney
stones and to be taken to bouts of giddy madness. We see him dressed in Anne’s
coronation gown, dancing energetically with male courtiers, goading the new
Church of England and the Puritans and seeking guidance and acceptance from
Anne's ghost. James Garnon plays the part with a mixture of wretched soul
searching and gay abandon, complete with physical tics, anguished howls and
unnerving maniacal laughter.
I
think that this production should form a part of the modern curriculum; it
could equally cover drama, history and RE and is readily accessible for
all to understand - I took Jess to see it and, as she had just finished
the Tudors in her history lessons, she found the show fascinating, engaging and
completely enthralling.
No comments:
Post a Comment