You’re not trying to work out whodunit, more why’d he do it ?
Richard Harris, well known and
much published writer, has penned a pseudo nostalgic look back at the 70’s
whodunit in this tense and twisting 3 header threaded by a Dostoevsky theme
and asking one of the most basic questions, what would you do for revenge?.
Set in a flat in London, the play
is very much in 2 halves; 1st part centres on Paul Opacic as
Hallett, the sweeny-esque ‘sarf Londarn’ copper, a stereotypical Detective
Sergeant portraying confidence bordering on the arrogance hewn from total
belief that he is the law. Playing
against him is Robert Gwilym as Stone, at first glance a bumbling, socially
uncomfortable loner whose main intent seems to be the salvation of his ne’er
seen wayward son, but who in reality could be just one wrong glance away from
psychopathic fury.
Stone has contacted Hallett to
help him in a bid to break his son away from the seedy side of life, yet, right
from the start, there is a nagging doubt that things aren’t all that they
seem. Despite appearing slow and
dodderish, Stone occasionally has moments of total lucidity, almost prophetic
in clarity and dangerously accurate in predicting how Hallett will react and
through it all there sits an undercurrent of dislike towards the policeman
bordering on despisement.
The second act introduces Dee
played by Joanna Higson; Dee is a now famous playwright but was once a young
journalist who used her real life reporting experience to fashion the plot lines
and characters for her plays. Initially drawn to the flat by Stone’s attempt to
get her to review his wife’s manuscript, we are quickly left in no doubt that
there is far more to Stone’s motives.
The tension mounts as past
interactions are revealed; Hallett was a young and determined DC who made his
own judgements and then manufactured investigations to support them, Dee was
not above twisting the truth if it gave a more dramatic end to her plays. The depth of Stone’s planning and
manipulations then come to the fore and whilst for many the ending was as
expected, there is no one who could honestly say the route taken to get there
was signposted.
As a new play from the Middle Ground Theatre Company, this suffers from
being over-wordy and would benefit from trimming; the pace fluctuates too much
and there is a noticeable lull in the middle of both acts which tests the
audience’s concentration. It is the
brilliant acting of Opacic, Higson and the dangerously good Gwilym that rescues
the plot and keeps minds from wandering but with a few nips & tucks this
could be a great ‘modern’ murder mystery in keeping with the greats of the
genre. Perhaps writer and director need
to revisit the adage “less is more”.